Core Rules - Revision history

NMWikiWeb: /* Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity */

2022-05-02T16:15:21Z

Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 2 May 2022
Line 128:		Line 128:
	<br>		<br>

	If a rule is malformed and does not apply the boolean logic, the software will display an error during the saving of the involved rule.		We advise the user to implement the value rules comparison within Core Rules and include them in the Setup Rule, for example.
			<br>It simplifies the readability and the maintanability of the overall rule.
			<br>If a rule is malformed and does not apply the boolean logic, the software will display an error during the saving of the involved rule.

NMWikiWeb: /* Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity */

2022-05-02T16:13:03Z

Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 2 May 2022
Line 102:		Line 102:
	<br>		<br>

	Following the boolean logic, it's not possible to compare a value directly with neighbour ~~value~~. A logical operator has to be used to do properly the comparison.		Following the boolean logic, it's not possible to compare a value directly with neighbour values more than one at a time. A logical operator has to be used to do properly the comparison.
	<br>For example, this condition is comparing the High and the Low with the MA Indicator value. The user wants to check if the MA is included between the High and the Low of the last candle :		<br>For example, this condition is comparing the High and the Low with the MA Indicator value. The user wants to check if the MA is included between the High and the Low of the last candle :
	[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 1.png\|800px\|left]]		[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 1.png\|800px\|left]]

NMWikiWeb: /* Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity */

2022-05-02T16:12:23Z

Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:12, 2 May 2022
Line 127:		Line 127:
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>
	~~<br>~~
	~~<br>~~
	If a rule is malformed and does not apply the boolean logic, the software will display an error during the saving of the involved rule.		If a rule is malformed and does not apply the boolean logic, the software will display an error during the saving of the involved rule.

NMWikiWeb: /* Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity */

2022-05-02T16:12:12Z

Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:12, 2 May 2022
Line 128:		Line 128:
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>
			<br>
			If a rule is malformed and does not apply the boolean logic, the software will display an error during the saving of the involved rule.

NMWikiWeb: /* Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity */

2022-05-02T16:11:10Z

Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 2 May 2022
Line 103:		Line 103:

	Following the boolean logic, it's not possible to compare a value directly with neighbour value. A logical operator has to be used to do properly the comparison.		Following the boolean logic, it's not possible to compare a value directly with neighbour value. A logical operator has to be used to do properly the comparison.
	For example, this condition is comparing the High and the Low with the MA Indicator value. The user wants to check if the MA is included between the High and the Low of the last candle :		<br>For example, this condition is comparing the High and the Low with the MA Indicator value. The user wants to check if the MA is included between the High and the Low of the last candle :
	[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 1.png\|800px\|left]]		[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 1.png\|800px\|left]]
	<br>		<br>

NMWikiWeb: /* Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity */

2022-05-02T16:10:56Z

Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 2 May 2022
Line 105:		Line 105:
	For example, this condition is comparing the High and the Low with the MA Indicator value. The user wants to check if the MA is included between the High and the Low of the last candle :		For example, this condition is comparing the High and the Low with the MA Indicator value. The user wants to check if the MA is included between the High and the Low of the last candle :
	[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 1.png\|800px\|left]]		[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 1.png\|800px\|left]]
			<br>
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>

NMWikiWeb: /* Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity */

2022-05-02T16:10:40Z

Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 2 May 2022
Line 86:		Line 86:
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>
			<br>
			<br>
	For example, this condition is not valid because the logic cannot apply an addition to a Conditional rule (here the "Is Bullish" condition) :		For example, this condition is not valid because the logic cannot apply an addition to a Conditional rule (here the "Is Bullish" condition) :
	[[File:BooleanAlgebra 2.png\|800px\|left]]		[[File:BooleanAlgebra 2.png\|800px\|left]]
Line 112:		Line 113:
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>
			<br>
			<br>
	However, this can't be done this way because the boolean logic requires the inclusion of at least 1 logical operator (AND operator or OR operator). The proper way to do the comparison is the following :		However, this can't be done this way because the boolean logic requires the inclusion of at least 1 logical operator (AND operator or OR operator). The proper way to do the comparison is the following :
	[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 2.png\|800px\|left]]		[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 2.png\|800px\|left]]
			<br>
			<br>
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>

NMWikiWeb: /* Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity */

2022-05-02T16:10:19Z

Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 2 May 2022
Line 76:		Line 76:

	The overall condition of a Setup Rule will always be a condition rule, even if composed by a group of associative Value rules and Conditional rules :		The overall condition of a Setup Rule will always be a condition rule, even if composed by a group of associative Value rules and Conditional rules :
	[[File:BooleanAlgebra 1.png\|~~600px~~\|left]]		[[File:BooleanAlgebra 1.png\|800px\|left]]
	~~<br>~~
	~~<br>~~
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>
Line 90:		Line 88:

	For example, this condition is not valid because the logic cannot apply an addition to a Conditional rule (here the "Is Bullish" condition) :		For example, this condition is not valid because the logic cannot apply an addition to a Conditional rule (here the "Is Bullish" condition) :
	[[File:BooleanAlgebra 2.png\|~~600px~~\|left]]		[[File:BooleanAlgebra 2.png\|800px\|left]]
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>
Line 105:		Line 103:
	Following the boolean logic, it's not possible to compare a value directly with neighbour value. A logical operator has to be used to do properly the comparison.		Following the boolean logic, it's not possible to compare a value directly with neighbour value. A logical operator has to be used to do properly the comparison.
	For example, this condition is comparing the High and the Low with the MA Indicator value. The user wants to check if the MA is included between the High and the Low of the last candle :		For example, this condition is comparing the High and the Low with the MA Indicator value. The user wants to check if the MA is included between the High and the Low of the last candle :
	[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 1.png\|~~600px~~\|left]]		[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 1.png\|800px\|left]]
	~~<br>~~
	~~<br>~~
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>
Line 118:		Line 114:

	However, this can't be done this way because the boolean logic requires the inclusion of at least 1 logical operator (AND operator or OR operator). The proper way to do the comparison is the following :		However, this can't be done this way because the boolean logic requires the inclusion of at least 1 logical operator (AND operator or OR operator). The proper way to do the comparison is the following :
	[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 2.png\|~~600px~~\|left]]		[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 2.png\|800px\|left]]
	~~<br>~~
	~~<br>~~
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>

NMWikiWeb at 16:09, 2 May 2022

2022-05-02T16:09:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 2 May 2022
Line 76:		Line 76:

	The overall condition of a Setup Rule will always be a condition rule, even if composed by a group of associative Value rules and Conditional rules :		The overall condition of a Setup Rule will always be a condition rule, even if composed by a group of associative Value rules and Conditional rules :
	[[File:BooleanAlgebra 1.png\|left]]		[[File:BooleanAlgebra 1.png\|600px\|left]]
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>
Line 90:		Line 90:

	For example, this condition is not valid because the logic cannot apply an addition to a Conditional rule (here the "Is Bullish" condition) :		For example, this condition is not valid because the logic cannot apply an addition to a Conditional rule (here the "Is Bullish" condition) :
	[[File:BooleanAlgebra 2.png\|left]]		[[File:BooleanAlgebra 2.png\|600px\|left]]
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>
Line 105:		Line 105:
	Following the boolean logic, it's not possible to compare a value directly with neighbour value. A logical operator has to be used to do properly the comparison.		Following the boolean logic, it's not possible to compare a value directly with neighbour value. A logical operator has to be used to do properly the comparison.
	For example, this condition is comparing the High and the Low with the MA Indicator value. The user wants to check if the MA is included between the High and the Low of the last candle :		For example, this condition is comparing the High and the Low with the MA Indicator value. The user wants to check if the MA is included between the High and the Low of the last candle :
	[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 1.png\|left]]		[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 1.png\|600px\|left]]
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>
Line 118:		Line 118:

	However, this can't be done this way because the boolean logic requires the inclusion of at least 1 logical operator (AND operator or OR operator). The proper way to do the comparison is the following :		However, this can't be done this way because the boolean logic requires the inclusion of at least 1 logical operator (AND operator or OR operator). The proper way to do the comparison is the following :
	[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 2.png\|left]]		[[File:BooleanAlgebra Comparison 2.png\|600px\|left]]
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>

NMWikiWeb: /* Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity */

2022-05-02T16:09:15Z

Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity

@@ Line 71: / Line 71: @@
 === Conditions and Values Core Rules associativity ===
 Since Conditional and Value rules do not represent the same kind of object, the user has to mix them all together with a certain logic.
 The Conditional rule can only return True or False as a statement. The Value rule can return any integer or floating number value.
-The overall condition of a Setup Rule will always be a condition rule, even if composed by a group of associative Value rules :
+The overall condition of a Setup Rule will always be a condition rule, even if composed by a group of associative Value rules and Conditional rules :
 [[File:BooleanAlgebra 1.png|left]]
 <br>
@@ Line 86: / Line 88: @@
 <br>
 <br>
 For example, this condition is not valid because the logic cannot apply an addition to a Conditional rule (here the "Is Bullish" condition) :
 [[File:BooleanAlgebra 2.png|left]]
 <br>
 <br>
 <br>